A term I've come to learn to hate when discussing martial arts is 'sport.' The term 'sport' has grown a few new synonyms in the TMA community and that's limited and inferior. When discussing systems like MMA, and arts like BJJ, Muay Thai, Wrestling, Boxing, , etc..a sentence that typically follows is that they are "just sports." From this I've come to learn that 'sport' is an elitist title dubbed by the traditionalist community to separate themselves from, and create a false sense of superiority to more modern systems. It's a meaningless word. This is not to say that these arts don't have sports applications. It would be ridiculous to suggest otherwise. But sport in this sense is just being used to demean arts.
As I stated earlier, 'sport' is a meaningless word. Why? Members of the traditional community say you have to train in self-defense in order to be able to defend oneself? Why exactly though? As discussed in earlier posts, muscle memory is one of the key traits in learning to fight. Muscle memory are neural pathways that are created from doing a repeated action over and over again, similar to how one would develop muscle memory in pulling out a phone when your bored, or learning to type on a keyboard. It becomes instinctual, as you make no conscious effort to perform the action. Traditionalists claim you have to train within a self-defense context, but your body will react the same way when conflict arises. It doesn't matter if you trained for an opponent across the ring, or for a mugger. The bottom line is:
"The context in which you train doesn't matter. What matters is how we train."
And how we train is important. When we develop muscle memory, we are training correctly. When we participate in full contact sparring, and training in aliveness, we are training correctly. When we live in delusion by limiting our main training tools to kata's and other dead, scripted drills, and we dismiss sparring as mere "sports apparatuses," that's when we are training incorrectly.
The next logical argument would be that 'sport' arts don't train in weapons. This is a fair point. However I take issue with arts that train in nunchakus, bo staff's, sai, etc..it's funny at this point that these arts have anything worthwhile to say at all. Hypocrisy runs deep in these arts. They quibble at the fact that 'sport' arts don't train for self-defense, but then you have guys training with bo staffs that say they are. Unless you plan on carrying said bo staff around with your ninja fanny pack of goodies, then you aren't training for self-defense either. You're participating in LARP'ing (Live Action Role Playing).
The only logical weapons training is with firearms and knives. I'll often encounter hardcore Kali/Escrima practitioners, that pride themselves on the hardened level of training. If they're not beating the shit out of each other with sticks, they're regularly utilizing shock knives into their training, that can produce a 7500 volt shock, to mimic the burn you'd feel from being cut by a knife. So what's not to be scared of? It's gotta be legit at that point. People that have been in knife fights would probably disagree. They know that there are no winners in a knife fight. One person is just internally bleeding a little less than the other guy. Knife training is fictional. And if a gun is introduced, by a guy that know's how to use it, no amount of martial arts training will save you. I don't care if you hold two heavyweight Champion titles, you aren't walking away without a new hole in your body.
Speaking of the hypocrisy from earlier, it's convenient when arts, like Tae Kwon Do, Karate, and Judo, are almost always looked over, when discussing "sport" arts. For some reason, since these arts fall under the traditional banner, they are frequently given a pass and improperly labeled "self-defense." Well if we're playing fair, then they're "just sports," since Karateka's regularly trains for tournaments and Judo and TKD are regularly featured in the Olympics. That's about as 'sport' as you get. BJJ/MMA have yet to be watered down from their former selves, as a result of being placed in the Olympics.
But at the end of the day, arts have a sports and a self-defense application to them, whether you like it or not. Some train it with the intention of doing one over the other, but regardless that muscle memory is still hardwired into our bodies. Like pop issues in the media, silly titles are put there to distract us from the important things that matter. When we start focusing on substance, accountability and the manners in which we train, instead of silly titles, perhaps then we can begin to eradicate the fat and bullshit that have plagued the martial arts community for too long.
But at the end of the day, arts have a sports and a self-defense application to them, whether you like it or not. Some train it with the intention of doing one over the other, but regardless that muscle memory is still hardwired into our bodies. Like pop issues in the media, silly titles are put there to distract us from the important things that matter. When we start focusing on substance, accountability and the manners in which we train, instead of silly titles, perhaps then we can begin to eradicate the fat and bullshit that have plagued the martial arts community for too long.
Came over to your blog after seeing your comments get a bunch of downvotes on Yahoo Answers from angry TMA's. No surprise, it's a solid blog with good posts. And yeah, I cringe a bit every time I hear "sport martial art". The fact is, unless your train with aliveness and resistance you'll always be a "what if" kind of fighter.
ReplyDeleteThank you for your kind words. YA! is filled with angry TMA's. MMA has very little voice over there, so I do my best to be that voice. At the end of the day, those guys are going to believe whatever they want, I don't care. It's the next generation of martial artists I'm worried for. Kids shouldn't leave their gym/dojo with a false sense of skill because their teachers cling to dogma's and antiquated methods.
DeleteHave a great day and keep reading.
MMA/BJJ are not "just" sport, but they are almost entirely sport focused, and have very little, if nothing at all, to do with Self Defence. In fact, a lot of the skill you will learn in MAM/BJJ are counter productive for self defence purposes.
ReplyDeleteBy the same token most TMA's have over the last 100+ years systematically removed most of the Jutsu (designed to kill, maim or incapacitated the enemy) to make training safer and more sport orientated.
Your statement that BJJ/MMA have yet to be watered down though is wholly incorrect. BJJ (more accurately called Brazilian Judo) is derived from Kodokan Judo, which was created by removing all of the dangerous techniques from Japanese Ju-Jitsu so it could be practised safely as a sport and taught to children. That's about a watered down as you can get. Similarly MMA bans not only dangerous (end therefore effective for SD) techniques (eg 12-6 elbow) but also dangerous target areas' of the body (throat/groin) purely for reasons of competitor safety, again which ever way you want to cut it, that is watered down.
There is a snobbery from TMA's that MMA is a sport (not realsing that their own art is (probably) just that as well. But there is also a lot of delusion on the part of MMA fanboys who ascertain that if it doesn't work in the cage it is no good for SD.
Self-Defense is nothing more than an aim and a goal. By training you are creating muscle memory, in which your body will react the same regardless of the situation, so in a one on one, unarmed fight, your body will react the same as the guy that trains for self-defense. The other components of self defense, such as weapons defense, multiple opponents, etc...that stuff is fictional. I've answered in a few questions YA! how they're fictional. If you'd like me to go into that here, I can.
DeleteAs for BJJ being watered down. In some sense you are correct that Judo and BJJ became watered down from traditional jujutsu. BUT, in becoming watered down, they became whole different styles in of themselves. They created new material that went more in depth than the previous one did. Judo went more in depth into throws and sweeps than Jujutsu ever could. But BJJ had us going more in depth into ground work than Judo or Jujutsu ever did. Essentially with these styles they took one step back, and 3 steps forward.
I truly believe that the cage is the best place to see what works and what doesn't. You can say all day that what you do is self-defense, but unless you're practicing it on a live, resisting opponent regularly, you'll never know if it works or not. And while MMA fighters have some limitations in their rules, they know what it's like to fight against a resisting opponent. TMA'ers do not.